1. The Theory of Form does not establish the essential distinction between a set, whose unity is merely structural, not energetic, and a system, a metastable unity made of a plurality of sets among which there exists a relation of analogy and an energetic potential. Sets do not possess information. Their becoming can only be that of a degradation or augmentation of entropy. On the contrary, the system can be maintained in its being of metastability due to the activity of information which characterizes its systemic state. The Theory of Form has taken sets as totalities, whereas in fact they are only property of systems; however, systems cannot be totalized, because treating them as the sum of their elements ruins the consciousness of what informs the systems, namely the separation relative to the structures they contain, an analogical structure, disparation and, in general, the relational activity of information. What forms the nature of a system is the type of information that it conceals; however, information or relational activity cannot be quantified abstractly, but only characterized in reference to the designs or structures of the system where it exists; we should not confuse information with the signals of information, which can be quantified but which could not exist without a situation of information, i.e. without a system.
2.
数学联邦政治世界观提示您:看后求收藏(同人小说网http://tongren.me),接着再看更方便。