I shall make a last remark: when above I made certain personal observations, I spoke of a night of excitement when I worked in spite of myself. Such cases are frequent, and it is not necessary that the abnormal cerebral activity be caused by a physical excitant as in that I mentioned. It seems, in such cases, that one is present at his own unconscious work, made partially perceptible to the over-excited consciousness, yet without having changed its nature. Then we vaguely comprehend what distinguishes the two mechanisms or, if you wish, the working methods of the two egos. And the psychologic observations I have been able thus to make seem to me to confirm in their general outlines the views I have given.
最后,我想补充的是:当我做出如前所述的自我观察时,我谈到了一个激动的夜晚,当时我忘我地工作着。这种情况很常见,我提到的这种异常的大脑活动不需要物理刺激引发。在这种情况下,这种无意识工作有可能被过度兴奋的意识察觉到,但并没有改变它无意识工作的本质。这样,我们就大概地了解到是什么将这两种机制区分开,如果你愿意,也可以说是两种自我的工作方法。在我看来,我所做出的这些心理观察似乎证实了我给出的观点。
Surely they have need of [confirmation], for they are and remain in spite of all very hypothetical: the interest of the questions is so great that I do not repent of having submitted them to the reader.
当然,以上的观点仍需要证实,尽管上述的所有内容都是假说,但它们确实存在,这些问题是如此有趣,以至于我无悔地将它们交给读者。
数学联邦政治世界观提示您:看后求收藏(同人小说网http://tongren.me),接着再看更方便。