柏拉图主义的德勒兹式逆转（完结） (6-6)

24 According to Alain Badiou ’s Deleuze: The Clamor of Being , trans. Louise Burchill (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000 ), Deleuze fails to answer those questions convincingly. In fact, Badiou argues, far from overcoming and overturning Platonism , Deleuze’s thought consists in “a metaphysics of the One.” Despite his emphasis on multiplicities, difference, and diversity, Deleuze remains commit-ted to the univocity of being and a “Platonism of the virtual” which subordinates the actual to a new i gure of transcendence. For a further exploration in support of Badiou’s thesis, see Peter Hallward ’s Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation (London: Verso, 2000 ). For a critical assessment of Badiou’s claim, see Nathan Widder, “The Rights of Simulacra: Deleuze and the Univocity of Being,” Continental Philosophy Review , 31:4 ( 2001 ), 437–53, and Miguel de Beistegui, “The Ontological Dispute,” in Gabriel Riera (ed.), AlainBadiou: Philosophy and Its Conditions (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2005 ), pp. 47–58.

25 An intensity , Deleuze argues, is “constituted by a difference which itself refers to other differences (E–E’ where E refers to e–e’ and e to ε – ε ’)” ( DR 117).

26 LS 261–62; DR 126.

27 In 1993, Deleuze wrote the following: “It seems to me that I have com-pletely abandoned the notion of the simulacrum” ( TRM 362).

数学联邦政治世界观提示您：看后求收藏（同人小说网http://tongren.me），接着再看更方便。