SEP：黑格尔辨证法（三） (12-8)

• Kant, Immanuel, 1999 [1781], Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Citations to Kant’s text use the “Ak.” numbers, which appear in the margins of many translations of Kant’s works.)

• Plato, 1961, The Collected Dialogues of Plato: Including the Letters, edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Citations to Plato’s text use the Stephanus numbers, which appear in the margins of many translations of Plato’s works.)

Secondary Literature

• Bencivenga, Ermanno, 2000, Hegel’s Dialectical Logic, New York: Oxford University Press.

• Berto, Francesco, 2007, “Hegel’s Dialectics as a Semantic Theory: An Analytic Reading”, European Journal of Philosophy, 15(1): 19–39.

• Burbidge, John, 1981, On Hegel’s Logic: Fragments of a Commentary, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

• Düsing, Klaus, 2010, “Ontology and Dialectic in Hegel’s Thought”, translated by Andrés Colapinto, in The Dimensions of Hegel’s Dialectic, Nectarios G. Limmnatis (ed.), London: Continuum, pp. 97–122.

• Findlay, J.N., 1962, Hegel: A Re-Examination, New York: Collier Books.

• –––, 1966, Review of Hegel: Reinterpretation, Texts, and Commentary, by Walter Kaufmann. The Philosophical Quarterly, 16(65): 366–68.

• Forster, Michael, 1993, “Hegel’s Dialectical Method”, in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–170.

数学联邦政治世界观提示您：看后求收藏（同人小说网http://tongren.me），接着再看更方便。