This allows one to construct a choice set C for the corresponding equivalence relation E on [λ]ω. The method is as follows. Given an X ∈ [λ]ω, it follows from our stated assumptions that one may find an X' ∈ Vκ'ₙ for any given n>0 such that X' ∈ [ρ]ω for a ρ of cofinality ω between κ'ₙ₋₁ and κ'ₙ and an embedding ex.ₙ:Vᵨ₊₁ ≺ Vλ₊₁ which carries a sequence of hyper-enormous* cardinals cofinal in ρ to the critical sequence of j or a tail thereof,such that ex,ₙ(X')=X. This can be used together with the sequence of choice sets 〈Cα:α<λ〉to choose a member of the equivalence class of X,depending on n. Using the relation mentioned earlier between the different choice sets Cα,one can argue that this data can be chosen in such a way that the function mapping n to the chosen member of the equivalence class of X is in fact eventually constant,and that a choice set for the equivalence relation E can be constructed in this way.
However,this gives rise to a contradiction using the method of proof of Kunen’s inconsistency theorem. And this contradiction was obtained
数学联邦政治世界观提示您:看后求收藏(同人小说网http://tongren.me),接着再看更方便。